Section 42A Appeal - MESSRS A C WHITE

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: The findings available for download from this website are partially anonymised versions transcribed electronically from the original findings issued by the Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal ("SSDT"). They are intended to identify the Law Society of Scotland and the person against whom a tribunal action was raised, but not the other parties involved. SSDT has used its reasonable endeavours to ensure that the findings have been accurately transcribed and anonymised. However, due to the processes of electronic transcription used, SSDT cannot guarantee 100% accuracy. SSDT therefore provides these findings AS IS and does not warrant their accuracy, completeness nor that they are completely anonymised. SSDT shall not be liable for any loss, injury, damage, cost or expense arising from any inaccuracy in, incompleteness of or failure to completely anonymise any finding. By downloading any finding from this website, you agree to be bound by the terms of this disclaimer. In the event that you identify a possible inaccuracy, incompleteness or failure to anonymise, please draw this to the attention of SSDT so that SSDT may consider whether remedial action is required. You may contact SSDT at Unit 3.5, The Granary Business Centre, Coal Road, Cupar, Fife, KY15 5YQ

Solicitor(s)	MESSRS A C WHITE SOLICITORS 23 Wellington Square, Ayr
Tribunal Date	17/02/2009
Appeal Status	No Appeal
Downloads
Interlocutor	Edinburgh 17 February 2009. The Tribunal having considered the Appeal by Messrs A C White Solicitors, 23 Wellington Square, Ayr (“the Appellants”) against a finding of Inadequate Professional Service by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland (“the Law Society”) in relation to Mr D H Telford, 11 Highfield Terrace, Fairlie, Ayshire (“the Lay Complainer”) and a Direction that the fees and VAT charged by the Appellants be abated by 20% and that the Appellants pay £750 by way of compensation to the Lay Complainer; Find that the Decision of the Law Society dated 6 September 2007 has been wholly supplanted by the second Decision made by the Law Society in respect of the same matter following the reconsideration which was directed by the Ombudsman following the Lay Complainer’s complaint to the Ombudsman and further Find that accordingly all rights flowing from the first Decision fall and there is no longer any valid Appeal before the Tribunal and accordingly nothing for the Tribunal to rule on; Make a finding of no expenses due to or by any party and Direct that publicity be given to this Decision and that this publicity shall include the name of the Appellants. Vice Chairman

Glossary Item

Please note that Downloadable Versions of the Finding require you to have Adobe Reader™ installed on your computer. If you do not have this software, you can download it free of charge now from www.adobe.com.