THE COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND V GORDON COUTTS THOMSON FIRST RESPONDENT and MARIA THERESA THOMSON SECOND RESPONDENT and
Complaint (Second) by THE COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND V GORDON COUTTS THOMSON
FIRST RESPONDENT and MARIA THER
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
The findings available for download from this website
are partially anonymised versions transcribed electronically
from the original findings issued by the Scottish Solicitors'
Discipline Tribunal ("SSDT"). They are intended
to identify the Law Society of Scotland and the person
against whom a tribunal action was raised, but not the
other parties involved. SSDT has used its reasonable
endeavours to ensure that the findings have been accurately
transcribed and anonymised. However, due to the processes
of electronic transcription used, SSDT cannot guarantee
100% accuracy. SSDT therefore provides these findings
AS IS and does not warrant their accuracy, completeness
nor that they are completely anonymised. SSDT shall
not be liable for any loss, injury, damage, cost or
expense arising from any inaccuracy in, incompleteness
of or failure to completely anonymise any finding. By
downloading any finding from this website, you agree
to be bound by the terms of this disclaimer. In the
event that you identify a possible inaccuracy, incompleteness
or failure to anonymise, please draw this to the attention
of SSDT so that SSDT may consider whether remedial action
is required. You may contact SSDT at Unit 3.5, The Granary
Business Centre, Coal Road, Cupar, Fife, KY15 5YQ
|
| Solicitor(s) |
GORDON COUTTS THOMSON therein designed
as Solicitor, Unit 6, Sighthill Shopping Centre, Edinburgh and now residing at Coalheughhead Farmhouse, Harburn, West Lothian FIRST RESPONDENT and
MARIA THERESA THOMSON therein designed as
Solicitor, Unit 6, Sighthill Shopping Centre, Edinburgh and now residing at Coalheughhead Farmhouse, Harburn, West Lothian SECOND RESPONDENT |
|
| Tribunal
Date |
13/10/1999 |
|
| Appeal
Status |
|
|
| Downloads |
|
|
| Interlocutor |
Edinburgh 13th October 1999. Following the remit by the Court dated 12th March 1999, the newly constituted Tribunal having resumed consideration of the Complaint dated 30th June 1994 at the instance of the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Gordon Coutts Thomson and Maria Theresa and Another and the further Complaint at the instance of the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against the said Gordon Coutts Thomson and Maria Theresa Thomson and the submissions of the parties, in respect of the findings of professional misconduct that the Respondents were unable to produce any files or other records to justify fees claimed under the Legal Aid Advice and Assistance Scheme, failed to ensure that only fees properly due were charged to the Legal Aid Board, and were in breach of Rule 5 of the Solicitors (Scotland) (Advertising and Promotion) Practice Rules 1991, that the First Respondent was in breach of Rule 8 of said Rules, that the First and Second Respondents were in breach of Rule 3 of the Solicitors (Scotland) Practice Rules 1986 and Article 3 of the Code of Conduct for Scottish Solicitors, that the First and Second Respondents failed to supervise assistants adequately, that the First Respondent threatened a member of Lothian and Borders Police and showed discourtesy to the Court, that the First and Second Respondents brought the profession into disrepute and showed a disregard for the interests of clients, that they failed in their duty to act with fellow solicitors in a manner consistent with persons having mutual trust and confidence in each other and that the First and Second Respondents repeatedly failed to reply to correspondence from the Law Society, and from fellow solicitors, of new Order that the First and Second Respondents Gordon Coutts Thomson and Maria Theresa Thomson, be struck off the Roll of Solicitors in Scotland, Direct in terms of Section 53(6) of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980 that this order shall take effect upon the intimation of this decision, Reserve the matter of expenses including the expenses occasioned by the motion heard on 7th May 1999, and Direct that publicity to include the names of the Respondents be given to this decision. |
|
Glossary
Item
|
Please note
that Downloadable Versions of the
Finding require you to have Adobe
Reader™ installed on
your computer. If you do not have
this software, you can download
it free of charge now from www.adobe.com. |
|
|